<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>O'Reilly News: Microsoft</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.oreilly.com/" />
    
    <id>tag:news.oreilly.com,2008-09-16://44</id>
    <updated>
</updated>
    <subtitle>O'Reilly News - Spreading the knowledge of innovators</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>



<link rel="self" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/oreilly/windows" type="application/atom+xml" /><entry>
<title>Velocity Preview - The Greatest Good for the Greatest Number at Microsoft</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/o6xL8kGe6dU/velocity-preview---the-greates.html" />
<id>tag:radar.oreilly.com,2009://57.36154</id>

    <published>2009-05-18T15:07:01Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-18T15:08:44Z</updated>

    <summary>The psychology of engineering user experiences on the web can be difficult.  How much rich content can you place up on a page before the load time drives away your visitors?  Get the answer wrong, and you can end up with a ghost town; get it right and you're a star.  Eric Schurman knows this well, since he is responsible for just those kind of trade-off decisions on some of Microsoft's highest traffic pages.  He'll be speaking at O'Reilly's Velocity Conference in June, and he recently talked with us about how Microsoft tests different user experiences on small groups of visitors.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>James Turner</name>
        <uri>http://radar.oreilly.com/jamest</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="interviews" label="interviews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="operations" label="operations" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="velocity09" label="velocity09" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="velocityconf" label="velocityconf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="web20" label="web2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="webops" label="webops" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://radar.oreilly.com/">
        The psychology of engineering user experiences on the web can be difficult.  How much rich content can you place up on a page before the load time drives away your visitors?  Get the answer wrong, and you can end up with a ghost town; get it right and you're a star.  Eric Schurman knows this well, since he is responsible for just those kind of trade-off decisions on some of Microsoft's highest traffic pages.  He'll be speaking at O'Reilly's &lt;a href="http://conferences.oreilly.com/velocity"&gt;Velocity Conference&lt;/a&gt; in June, and he recently talked with us about how Microsoft tests different user experiences on small groups of visitors.
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/o6xL8kGe6dU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/05/velocity-preview---the-greates.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>


<entry>
<title>Dreaming of Rails as the Next Microsoft Access</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/qtoD7980ZY0/dreaming-of-rails-as-the-next.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.36119</id>

    <published>2009-05-05T02:39:23Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-05T15:42:37Z</updated>

    <summary>Rails?  Microsoft Access?  Aren't those from different planets?  Well, they may have different origins, but their similarities give me hope.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Simon St. Laurent</name>
        <uri>http://simonstl.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="access" label="access" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="database" label="database" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="rails" label="rails" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ruby" label="ruby" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spreadsheets" label="spreadsheets" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        Rails?  Microsoft Access?  Aren't those from different planets?  Well, they may have different origins, but their similarities give me hope.
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/qtoD7980ZY0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/05/dreaming-of-rails-as-the-next.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>



<entry>
<title>The Varieties of Openness Worth Wanting in the Cloud</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/08MTzmITOzM/cloud-varieties-of-openness-worth-wanting.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35721</id>

    <published>2009-03-27T21:42:03Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-27T22:23:56Z</updated>

    <summary>All of the vendors in the cloud space have paid lip service to the idea of Openness in the cloud; and most everyone believes that being "Open" is a "good thing". In an environment in which few people agree on the specifics of defining the term "cloud computing", what exactly does it mean to have an Open Cloud?</summary>
    <author>
        <name>George Reese</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="amazon" label="amazon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cloudcomputing" label="cloud computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="openness" label="openness" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        All of the vendors in the cloud space have paid lip service to the idea of Openness in the cloud; and most everyone believes that being "Open" is a "good thing". In an environment in which few people agree on the specifics of defining the term "cloud computing", what exactly does it mean to have an Open Cloud?
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/08MTzmITOzM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/03/cloud-varieties-of-openness-worth-wanting.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

<entry>
<title>Silverlight Development for the Flex Developer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/DOy5FVRMN5E/silverlight-development-for-th.html" />
<id>tag:www.insideria.com,2009://34.35693</id>

    <published>2009-03-25T16:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-26T16:49:39Z</updated>

    <summary>The jets and sharks, Hatfields and McCoys, Philadelphia Eagles and New York Giants, Adobe and Microsoft. Now several years in the making, the Adobe - Microsoft rivalry is gearing up. Especially with the anticipated new release of Silverlight 3 and Flex 4. As any seasoned Flex veteran will tell you, Adobe is the defacto standard for Rich Internet Applications. When asked about interest in Silverlight, the response may vary, but usually ends in “I haven’t actually spent a lot of time [or tried] it.” A product of Microsoft, Silverlight is. But as professionals in the RIA industry it is a good thing to be open minded. After all, as hard as it is to admit, Flash isn’t always the best tool for the job.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Lauck</name>
        <uri>http://deseloper.org</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Blogs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="adobe" label="adobe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="flex" label="flex" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="silverlight" label="silverlight" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.insideria.com/">
        The jets and sharks, Hatfields and McCoys, Philadelphia Eagles and New York Giants, Adobe and Microsoft. Now several years in the making, the Adobe - Microsoft rivalry is gearing up. Especially with the anticipated new release of Silverlight 3 and Flex 4. As any seasoned Flex veteran will tell you, Adobe is the defacto standard for Rich Internet Applications. When asked about interest in Silverlight, the response may vary, but usually ends in “I haven’t actually spent a lot of time [or tried] it.” A product of Microsoft, Silverlight is. But as professionals in the RIA industry it is a good thing to be open minded. After all, as hard as it is to admit, Flash isn’t always the best tool for the job.
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/DOy5FVRMN5E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.insideria.com/2009/03/silverlight-development-for-th.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>



<entry>
<title>O'Reilly Week in Review for March 16th, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/5Ln5FCwUyNg/oreilly-week-in-review-for-mar-2.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35646</id>

    <published>2009-03-18T23:20:01Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-19T03:41:29Z</updated>

    <summary>This week's roundup include discussion of the Sun/IBM rumors, the future of newspapers, Microsoft and Science Commons teaming up, and the weekly podcast quiz....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>James Turner</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="ibm" label="ibm" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="newspapers" label="newspapers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sun" label="sun" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="weekinreview" label="week in review" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        This week's roundup include discussion of the Sun/IBM rumors, the future of newspapers, Microsoft and Science Commons teaming up, and the weekly podcast quiz....
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/5Ln5FCwUyNg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/03/oreilly-week-in-review-for-mar-2.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

<entry>
<title>Microsoft and Science Commons Team Up To Add Semantic Content to Online Science</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/tmV_oO98zVM/microsoft-and-science-commons.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35565</id>

    <published>2009-03-11T15:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-11T15:12:46Z</updated>

    <summary>John Wilbanks, VP of Science for Creative Commons, gave O'Reilly Media an exclusive sneak preview of a joint announcement that they will be making with Microsoft later today at the O'Reilly Emerging Technology Conference.

According to John, who talked to us shortly after getting off a plane from Brazil, Microsoft will be releasing, under an open source license, Word plugins that will allow scientists to mark up their papers with scientific entities directly.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>James Turner</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="creativecommons" label="creative commons" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="science" label="science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="semanticweb" label="semantic web" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        John Wilbanks, VP of Science for Creative Commons, gave O'Reilly Media an exclusive sneak preview of a joint announcement that they will be making with Microsoft later today at the O'Reilly Emerging Technology Conference.

According to John, who talked to us shortly after getting off a plane from Brazil, Microsoft will be releasing, under an open source license, Word plugins that will allow scientists to mark up their papers with scientific entities directly.
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/tmV_oO98zVM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/03/microsoft-and-science-commons.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

<entry>
<title>Kodu: Visual Programming on the Xbox with P2P Level-sharing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/VNXuRWkAZtU/kodu-visual-programming-on-the.html" />
<id>tag:radar.oreilly.com,2009://57.35413</id>

    <published>2009-02-24T16:22:50Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-25T17:35:16Z</updated>

    <summary>How do you make programming fun? How do you make it fun enough for kids to want to spend hours learning how to make loops and if/then statements? Simple you give them simple visual commands that let them control robots on the Xbox --  or at least this is the thesis of Microsoft Research's Kodu. Kodu (formerly Boku) made a splash at Techfest two years ago and gave a demo at Ignite Seattle. Since that time the levels and characters have gotten much sexier and the controls simpler, but more powerful. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Brady Forrest</name>
        <uri>http://radar.oreilly.com/brady/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="etech" label="etech" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="kodu" label="kodu" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="msr" label="msr" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="web20" label="web 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://radar.oreilly.com/">
        How do you make programming fun? How do you make it fun enough for kids to want to spend hours learning how to make loops and if/then statements? Simple you give them simple visual commands that let them control robots on the Xbox --  or at least this is the thesis of Microsoft Research's Kodu. Kodu (formerly Boku) made a splash at Techfest two years ago and gave a demo at Ignite Seattle. Since that time the levels and characters have gotten much sexier and the controls simpler, but more powerful. 
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/VNXuRWkAZtU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/02/kodu-visual-programming-on-the.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

<entry>
<title>O'Reilly Week in Review for February 16th, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/ezbIzr0pVRQ/oreilly-week-in-review-for-feb-2.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35342</id>

    <published>2009-02-17T13:54:12Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-17T16:45:05Z</updated>

    <summary>This week's podcast includes a roundtable discussion by the editors of Microsoft's new retail initiative, excerpts of an interview with Andrew "bunnie" Huang about product design in China, as well as the weekly podquiz, your chance to score a free O'Reilly Book.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>James Turner</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="china" label="china" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="weekinreview" label="week in review" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        This week's podcast includes a roundtable discussion by the editors of Microsoft's new retail initiative, excerpts of an interview with Andrew "bunnie" Huang about product design in China, as well as the weekly podquiz, your chance to score a free O'Reilly Book.
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/ezbIzr0pVRQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/02/oreilly-week-in-review-for-feb-2.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>



<entry>
<title>Microsoft's Cloud Tax</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/h2DTWnT_d6g/microsofts-cloud-tax.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2008://53.34767</id>

    <published>2008-12-24T15:57:58Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-25T19:03:36Z</updated>

    <summary>The importance of the differences among web application platforms like .NET, JSP, PHP, etc. drops dramatically under the cloud computing paradigm. Which architecture you choose really comes down to one question: what kind of programming and support resources do you have? If the answer is "Microsoft technologies", however, you should be aware of the Microsoft cloud tax.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>George Reese</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="cloudcomputing" label="cloud computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ec2" label="ec2" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mysql" label="mysql" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        The importance of the differences among web application platforms like .NET, JSP, PHP, etc. drops dramatically under the cloud computing paradigm. Which architecture you choose really comes down to one question: what kind of programming and support resources do you have? If the answer is "Microsoft technologies", however, you should be aware of the Microsoft cloud tax.
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/h2DTWnT_d6g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/12/microsofts-cloud-tax.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

<entry>
<title>Data Center Power Efficiency</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/yoe8Akg2Mo4/data-center-power-efficiency.html" />
<id>tag:radar.oreilly.com,2008://57.34470</id>

    <published>2008-11-29T23:23:56Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T00:17:15Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[James Hamilton is one of the smartest and most accomplished engineers I know. He now leads Microsoft's Data Center Futures Team, and has been pushing the opportunities in data center efficiency and internet scale services both inside &amp; outside Microsoft. His most recent post explores misconceptions about the Cost of Power in Large-Scale Data Centers: I&#8217;m not sure how many...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jesse Robbins</name>
        <uri>http://radar.oreilly.com/jesse/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="cloudcomputing" label="cloud computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="energy" label="energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jameshamilton" label="james hamilton" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="operations" label="operations" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="performance" label="performance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="platforms" label="platforms" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="utilities" label="utilities" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="utilitycomputing" label="utility computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="velocity" label="velocity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="velocity09" label="velocity09" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="web20" label="web2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://radar.oreilly.com/">
        James Hamilton is one of the smartest and most accomplished engineers I know. He now leads Microsoft's Data Center Futures Team, and has been pushing the opportunities in data center efficiency and internet scale services both inside &amp;amp; outside Microsoft. His most recent post explores misconceptions about the Cost of Power in Large-Scale Data Centers: I&amp;#8217;m not sure how many...
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/yoe8Akg2Mo4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://radar.oreilly.com/2008/11/data-center-power-efficiency.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

<entry>
<title>Why Microsoft's free AV won't matter</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/R2txSFZmVdc/why-microsofts-free-av-wont-ma.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2008://53.34236</id>

    <published>2008-11-20T18:24:26Z</published>
    <updated>2008-11-20T21:47:20Z</updated>

    <summary>Earlier this week, Microsoft announced that they're going to stop selling their consumer security product OneCare, and instead they're going to give away for free an AV product based on the same technology. I've had several people ask me questions...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Viega</name>
        <uri>http://www.stonewallsoftware.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="antivirus" label="anti-virus" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="security" label="security" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        Earlier this week, Microsoft announced that they're going to stop selling their consumer security product OneCare, and instead they're going to give away for free an AV product based on the same technology. I've had several people ask me questions...
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/R2txSFZmVdc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/11/why-microsofts-free-av-wont-ma.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

<entry>
<title>Daddy, Where's Your Phone?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/lx629Rk5EF8/daddy-wheres-your-phone.html" />
<id>tag:radar.oreilly.com,2008://57.34151</id>

    <published>2008-11-17T13:27:17Z</published>
    <updated>2008-11-17T23:19:03Z</updated>

    <summary>I met recently with Vic Gundotra, formerly Microsoft's head of platform evangelism, and now VP of Engineering at Google, responsible for all their mobile efforts outside of Android. We were talking about Google's mobile strategy and the insanely cool new voice-activated Google search in the Google Mobile Application for iPhone. But what I really want to share is Vic's story...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tim O'Reilly</name>
        <uri>http://tim.oreilly.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="google" label="google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="iphone" label="iphone" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mobile" label="mobile" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="vicgundotra" label="vic gundotra" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="web20" label="web2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://radar.oreilly.com/">
        I met recently with Vic Gundotra, formerly Microsoft's head of platform evangelism, and now VP of Engineering at Google, responsible for all their mobile efforts outside of Android. We were talking about Google's mobile strategy and the insanely cool new voice-activated Google search in the Google Mobile Application for iPhone. But what I really want to share is Vic's story...
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/lx629Rk5EF8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://radar.oreilly.com/2008/11/daddy-wheres-your-phone.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

<entry>
<title>Why Jerry Seinfeld Probably Cost Microsoft a Lot More than $10 Million</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/BigsXvBu6ec/why-jerry-seinfeld-probably-co.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2008://53.34084</id>

    <published>2008-11-10T11:59:25Z</published>
    <updated>2008-11-11T01:23:24Z</updated>

    <summary>In this article, I want put forth a case study to demonstrate how capturing feelings on the social web can allow companies to measure the reputation of their brand.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nitesh Dhanjani</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="corporations" label="corporations" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="datavisualization" label="data visualization" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="economics" label="economics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="internetbusiness" label="internet business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="marketing" label="marketing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="privacy" label="privacy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="security" label="security" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="socialnetworking" label="social networking" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="virtualization" label="virtualization" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="windows" label="windows" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        In this article, I want put forth a case study to demonstrate how capturing feelings on the social web can allow companies to measure the reputation of their brand.
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/BigsXvBu6ec" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/11/why-jerry-seinfeld-probably-co.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>


<entry>
<title>Fake real-time blog from Document Interoperability Initiative 2 at Redmond</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/ROBmQ-j649g/fake-real-time-blog-from-docum.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2008://53.33947</id>

    <published>2008-10-29T07:47:08Z</published>
    <updated>2008-10-29T17:54:08Z</updated>

    <summary>Can Microsoft's idea of "document archetypes" and "interoperable templates" be ramped up to provide a fresh new approach to both better document interoperability and better descriptive markup?</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Rick Jelliffe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="odf" label="odf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="office" label="office" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ooxml" label="ooxml" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="xml" label="xml" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        Can Microsoft's idea of "document archetypes" and "interoperable templates" be ramped up to provide a fresh new approach to both better document interoperability and better descriptive markup?
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/ROBmQ-j649g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/10/fake-real-time-blog-from-docum.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>




<entry>
<title>Ballmer Says MS Will Release a New Version of Windows for the Cloud this Fall</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/7AUh_cyM_uo/ballmer-says-ms-will-release-a.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2008://53.33642</id>

    <published>2008-10-01T23:25:26Z</published>
    <updated>2008-10-03T00:58:53Z</updated>

    <summary>On Tuesday, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer reportedly gas said that the Company will release a new version of its Windows operating system as part of a new cloud computing platform in a matter of weeks. Call it "Windows Cloud" for now, but how seriously should we take his words?</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Osborn</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="cloudcomputing" label="cloud computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="windows" label="windows" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        On Tuesday, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer reportedly gas said that the Company will release a new version of its Windows operating system as part of a new cloud computing platform in a matter of weeks. Call it "Windows Cloud" for now, but how seriously should we take his words?
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/7AUh_cyM_uo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/10/ballmer-says-ms-will-release-a.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

<entry>
<title>Is Adobe Still Sleeping Well?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/H0dWrZpwwC4/is-adobe-still-sleeping-well.html" />
<id>tag:radar.oreilly.com,2008://57.33577</id>

    <published>2008-09-26T23:47:18Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-29T23:54:40Z</updated>

    <summary>Last May, Tim O'Reilly posted a piece on whether or not Adobe was worried about the new threat to their dominance in the RIA space by the introduction of Silverlight from Microsoft. In a nutshell, the answer was no. From a book sales perspective, that was true and remains true today. But there is more to that answer than what...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Hendrickson</name>
        <uri>http://www.mikehendrickson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="air" label="air" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="flash" label="flash" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="flex" label="flex" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="silverlight" label="silverlight" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://radar.oreilly.com/">
        Last May, Tim O'Reilly posted a piece on whether or not Adobe was worried about the new threat to their dominance in the RIA space by the introduction of Silverlight from Microsoft. In a nutshell, the answer was no. From a book sales perspective, that was true and remains true today. But there is more to that answer than what...
     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/H0dWrZpwwC4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://radar.oreilly.com/2008/09/is-adobe-still-sleeping-well.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

<entry>
<title>Microsoft Research offers a sampling in Cambridge, Massachusetts</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.oreilly.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~3/s_Lui2U_qq8/microsoft-research-offers-a-sa.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2008://53.33497</id>

    <published>2008-09-23T00:51:32Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-23T17:37:48Z</updated>

    <summary>The opening of Microsoft Research's latest facility was celebrated
today with a free one-day symposium here in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
I think the symposium succeeded in its goals of showing that the
research facility is an independent entity that plays by the rules of
open scientific debate and funds basic research of value to society.
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Andy Oram</name>
        <uri>http://www.praxagora.com/andyo/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="microsoft" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="patents" label="patents" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
        The opening of Microsoft Research's latest facility was celebrated
today with a free one-day symposium here in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
I think the symposium succeeded in its goals of showing that the
research facility is an independent entity that plays by the rules of
open scientific debate and funds basic research of value to society.

     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/oreilly/windows/~4/s_Lui2U_qq8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/09/microsoft-research-offers-a-sa.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>

</feed>
